Author Topic: Sociological vs Anthropological Perspectives  (Read 110 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Mathosophy

  • { }
  • { ∅, { ∅ } }
  • Posts: 5132
  • Life teaches us not to want it.
    • What Now?
Sociological vs Anthropological Perspectives
« on: December 03, 2025, 03:57:34 am »
I asked startpage.com an interesting question about "pair-bonding" or "mating" and discovered a free Anthropology textbook of some kind: 

Behave: The Biology of Humans at Our Best and Worst


There was also one called Race, Evolution, and Behavior.   Whereas neither Arthur Schopenhauer or I would have anyone believe in "race," there are traits in strains of our diverse species that have been influenced by climate and ecosystems.

“(An) incendiary thesis....that separate races of human beings evolved different  reproductive strategies to cope with different environments and that these strategies led to physical differences in brain size and hence in intelligence. Human beings who evolved in the warm but highly unpredictable environment of Africa adopted a strategy of high reproduction, while human beings who migrated to the hostile cold of Europe and northern Asia took to producing fewer children but nurturing them more carefully.”

 —Malcolm W. Browne, New York Times Book Review


I did not get any real answers to my personal question, but it is most likely more of a sociological question.  The search engine is coming up with anthropological and biological answers. 

That's why I am "tossing" these results into this section of the message board, the so-called "junk drawer" ... I will return to this some other time, maybe ...
« Last Edit: December 03, 2025, 04:21:05 am by Mad Dog Mike »
High Priest of the Hi-Tech Lowlifes
King of the Enraged Philosophers-in-Rags

~ Tabak und Kaffee Süchtigen ~

Things They Will Never Tell You
Arthur Schopenhauer has been the most radical and defiant of all troublemakers.

Mike H------H

Share on Bluesky Share on Facebook