I wish someone translated the Berlin Lectures. Maybe Schopenhauer is ,after all, checking out this message board from the other side,from time to time, and sent this book as the answer to our queries.
In the collection,
Language, Logic and Mathematics in Schopenhauer, in one of the chapters written by the editor Jens Lemanski, Pages 47-71,
Concept Diagrams and the Context Principle, in section 4 (Schopenhauer's Concept Diagrams and the Context Principle, I quote:
I only refer to Schopenhauer's Berlin Lectures, which are published in the Manuscript Remains. These lectures were elaborated in the 1820's, edited by Mockrauser for the first time in 1913, and reprinted in 1986. In what follows, I am referring to the Mockrauser edition of 1913.
I, maybe not by luck or coincidence, but by conscious deliberation at the time of tracking down and purchasing, have in my possession, Volume 3 of the Manuscript Remains, that is,
Berlin Manucripts (1818-1830) ... in English ... very small print, so it has been slow-going. I actually require a magnifying glass to read it. I think I had found a copy for less than 50 frog skins at the time. Well, one thing is certain: this presently released Language, Logic, and Mathematics in Schopenhauer will inspire, motivate, and most likely guide my careful inspection of the large volume 3 of Manuscipt Remains. Just flipping to a random page, I was struck by a paragraph discussing
word and
concept. Already, I think the scholars, including the editor, who wrote the chapters of the book I've read so far, have influenced
my reading of the Manuscript Remains. I have been spoiled by the ability to increase font sizes on terminals and screens, so, as with the mathematics texts, which are always hard copies, rarely digital, I just have to use magnifying glass (and for laying on back, reading glasses).
Also, on the inner flap/cover of Volume 3 [Berlin Manuscripts], it is written that the English version of
The Manuscript Remains represents the first five parts; the sixth (Vol V: Notes on Books) was declared untranslatable by Payne.
It was back in 2016 that Holden made me aware of the Manuscript Remains. I was not at all aware of their existence.
The Will's Harmonic Motion (2016)
Schopenhauer Manuscript RemainsSchopenhauer's Philosophy of mathematicsMy parents, made me call up a young lady, who possess a post graduate degree in mathematics .I talked to her over the telephone and she seems to me to be obsessed with getting married and even more obsessed with having kids.
I ,on the other hand, am determined to dedicate all of the life to pessimistic philosophy(language, logic and mathematics being very much a part of it).
The paradox here is that ,generally speaking, people who are good at maths are supposed to wise.
The incontrovertible fact here is that,she is maths postgraduate major and I continue to struggle with even basic mathematics(but I grown to rather like this struggle). Yet, she is one who is determined to cause more suffering, more chaos.I just want to cease to exist.
I am not so sure if those who have the discipline and support to excel in the formal study of mathematics are necessarily wise. In fact, all scientific professions require the scientist to be proficient in the language of mathematics. Not all scientists are necessarily wise.
Is wisdom related to formal academic training?
I would not think so, since there are wise people with little formal education. I have made the efforts to get some formal education, but I sense any wisdom I have attained came from my lived experience, and certainly not from the Field Axioms or finding roots of polynomials.
Those of us who shy away from marriage and reproduction may be tapping into a wisdom that transcends the dictates of the survival of the species.
I suppose many men might be intimidated by this young woman, with her knowledge of advanced mathematics. Did you explain to her your apprehensions about bringing sentient life into this?