Dear Senor Raul,
Deleuze writes a great deal about rhizomes.The conventional script says that I should get married,have kids,look for the next promotion,buy a car.But I like to read about Ahabs obsession with Moby Dick the whale,I like to do my own kind of maths.
The definition of the gort society-the society obsessed with channeling the sem-en stream into a vag-ina instead of allowing it to fall sterile to the ground.
While I agree with Deleuze that one should try to look for rhizomes instead of being a part of the conventional tree,where I disagree,vehemently, is his apparent optimism that rhizomes,might,in the long term overcome the tree.
In the Indian society,one of the first things they ask you is -how many kids have you got?
What if I were to answer the question with the description of the different types of equations I can comprehend.
Think about it-Schopenhauer was not expressly looking for dismal career as an academician nor was Van Gogh actively seeking failure as an artist,and yet these two things had to happen inexorably,there is no rhizome,no matter how complex or intricate,which could have turned Schopenhauer into a successful lecturer and Van gogh into a successful painter,failure,worldly failure,was writ large in their very DNA.
Who knows,maybe,the failure,which the common man so despises,might not be the real success.Maybe nothing succeeds like failure?One must have a stout heart like that of Schopenhauer to withstand failure after failure,humiliation after humiliation and yet who could say with certainly that Schopenhauer himself did not go to bed every night with death-wish on his lips?
Take care.